It may be that the local road safety partnership run a 'speed awareness' course that the errant driver can sign up for (at a cost mind) but these are normally only available for a first offence and then one that is below the national limit of 70, if over 70 then they get a bit anal.
Of course, there may be extenuating circumstances... she was a lone female driver, sacred stupid because of that perverted nutter that was making leary looks and gestures at her in the traffic in town caught up with her about 3 miles back and she booted it away from him....
That said, if court is on the cards and loss of licence etc... Get legal advice and check...
All details on the letter (NIP), are they correct? Spelt right, time right etc etc, do they compare EXACTLY with plods evidential paperwork?
Was the 'camera' (not all handheld devices used by plod are cameras) used in date re calibration? Did plod fill in the form (part of the evidence provided) stating when they started the shift, left the nick, checked the camera calibration (on a fixed object) on arrival at the trap and before using it. AND re-checked the calibration on a fixed object after use and before leaving the trap?
Was plod actually trained to use the camera, and is that training still in date?
This posting may have been helpfull, on the other hand probably not... Either way, I may have had drink when posting it in which case it's probably not as helpfull as it could have been
Work safe, and remember all technical problems can be resolved with a hammer, the trick is knowing where to hit it and how big a hammer to use (I often find it may also help to have a spare bit in the shed to replace the bit you have just mullered

)
Work in Progress (or not as the case may be) I give you....
'O-no' the truck.Comments on 'O-no' the truck may be left
hereWork in Progress (or not as the case may be) I give you....
'Truck'Comments on 'Truck' the truck may be left
hereOwning a 2.8 is a hobby in it's self...