Its the damn brake lights on em that get you if you are following an auto...manuals doesnt use brakes much offroad, but auto's need to dab em all the time...
They should make the "automatic" badge huge on the back of them, so peeps following know to ignore their brake lights.
Gotta say I have offroaded a couple of auto's, a 3.9 Rangey, a 4.2 patrol and a shogunV6. This was laning and P&P.
For climbing they were good, and to pedals and 2 feet worked well on climbs where you had to stop and start again. All of them had plenty of grunt, which helped no-end, but I think a smaller engined auto would be a bit lame offroad. Saying that I hate auto's on anything with a smaller engine, they need big CC grunt to work well I think without lurching through gearchanges on both road cars and 4x4's...I have to say of the 3 auto's I offroaded only one, the nissan, didnt develop gearbox problems..Both the RR and Shoguns gearboxes died...
Descent control is an issue, but not much worse than with a 2.0i sport fronty in fairness...cadence braking being the answer...Most auto's tend to be designed with better braking capacity anyway. And park on an autobox is the best handbrake ever, and the engine can be revved at the same time for winching etc.
I have to say I prefer a manual offroad, I like that positive drivetrain connection where you can switch between power and engine braking just by lifting a pedal...Its easier with a manual to use weight transfer by rocking the car to get you unstuck or out of a cross axle. Some of the things that we do in the more extreme sorts of offroading would kill an auto in minutes too, like coming down hills forwards in reverse, switching quickly between reverse and first to rock the car out of a stuck. I wouldnt feel confident pushing the truck over to extremes of angles either when its drive effectively disconnects when I lift off.
so for laning and the like an auto will be fine, just practise cadence braking before...If you are gonna get brutal offroad with it, expect gearbox issues...